Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Pronzato, Chiara Daniela
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
Discussion Paper series, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit 6803
This paper compares two different ways of doing policy evaluation: on the one hand, quasi-experimental methods (or ex-post evaluations) which exploit the introduction of a reform and identify its effect by comparing treated and untreated individuals; on the other hand, structural models (or ex-ante evaluations) which are based on economic theory and predict the effect of potential reforms by using the estimates of behavioural parameters. The comparison is carried out using an empirical case. In 1998, in Norway, a major welfare reform changed the rules of the most generous benefit for lone parents: it increased the amount of the benefit and introduced working requirements. Using a quasi-experimental evaluation approach, it is found a positive effect of the reform on lone mothers' employment. In this paper, I estimate a static structural model of work and welfare participation decisions and compare the results using the two different approaches. Despite the differences in the assumptions I make for the two models, results are fairly comparable.
lone mothers
in-work benefits
quasi-experimental evaluation designs
discrete choice modelling
ex-ante and ex-post evaluation
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
193.36 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.