Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/62525 
Year of Publication: 
2012
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 6782
Publisher: 
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
We investigate the effect of firms' participation in an insurance scheme on the long-term sickness absence of their employees, using administrative records. In Denmark and several other European countries, firms are obliged to cover the first two weeks of sickness. The insurance scheme is provided by government authority and is designed to help small firms with the financial burden related to sickness absence of their workers. We use an exogenously-set threshold for the eligibility as a policy experiment. Using regression discontinuity in the fuzzy form, we show that sickness absence in insured firms is much more prevalent than in uninsured firms. Sickness spells in insured firms are shorter and the conditional probability to return back to work from sickness is much higher in insured firms. These results suggest that employees in insured firms are less monitored during the first two weeks and that their sickness is less serious. We demonstrate in the paper that the minimum cost of the present insurance scheme is similar to about 1100 man-years. On top of that comes a substantial cost to more short time sickness.
Subjects: 
sickness absence
moral hazard
insurance for employers
JEL: 
I12
J28
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
584.33 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.