Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/61260
Authors: 
Gneezy, Uri
Güth, Werner
Verboven, Frank
Year of Publication: 
1998
Series/Report no.: 
Discussion Papers, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes 1998,56
Abstract: 
Individuals frequently transfer commodities without an explicit contract or an implicit enforcement mechanism. We design an experiment to study whether such commodity transfers can be viewed as investments based on trust and reciprocity, or whether they rather resemble presents with distributional intentions. Our experiment essentially modifies Berg et al.'s investment game by introducing an upper bound to what a contributor can be repaid afterwards. By varying this upper bound, extreme situations such as unrestricted repayment and no repayment (dictator giving) can be approximated without altering the verbal instructions otherwise. Our results show that individuals contribute more when large repayments are feasible. This is consistent with the trust and reciprocity hypothesis. Although distributional concerns in some contributions can be traced, they are not nearly close to a preference for equal payoffs.
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
139.95 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.