Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/60856
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAdrian, Tobiasen_US
dc.contributor.authorAshcraft, Adam B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-02en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-17T14:35:39Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-17T14:35:39Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/60856-
dc.description.abstractShadow banks conduct credit intermediation without direct, explicit access to public sources of liquidity and credit guarantees. Shadow banks contributed to the credit boom in the early 2000s and collapsed during the financial crisis of 2007-09. We review the rapidly growing literature on shadow banking and provide a conceptual framework for its regulation. Since the financial crisis, regulatory reform efforts have aimed at strengthening the stability of the shadow banking system. We review the implications of these reform efforts for shadow funding sources including asset-backed commercial paper, triparty repurchase agreements, money market mutual funds, and securitization. Despite significant efforts by lawmakers, regulators, and accountants, we find that progress in achieving a more stable shadow banking system has been uneven.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aFederal Reserve Bank of New York |cNew York, NYen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aStaff Report, Federal Reserve Bank of New York |x559en_US
dc.subject.jelG28en_US
dc.subject.jelG20en_US
dc.subject.jelG24en_US
dc.subject.jelG01en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordshadow bankingen_US
dc.subject.keywordfinancial regulationen_US
dc.titleShadow banking regulationen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn715049917en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.