Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/60699 
Year of Publication: 
2004
Series/Report no.: 
Staff Report No. 190
Publisher: 
Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York, NY
Abstract: 
We conduct a systematic comparison of confidence intervals around estimated probabilities of default (PD), using several analytical approaches from large-sample theory and bootstrapped small-sample confidence intervals. We do so for two different PD estimation methods
Subjects: 
cohort and duration (intensity)
JEL: 
G21
G28
C16
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
373.11 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.