Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/60408
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDyzenhaus, Daviden_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-13T10:40:54Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-13T10:40:54Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/60408-
dc.description.abstractI argue that legal and constitutional theory should avoid the idea of constituent power. It is unhelpful in seeking to understand the authority of law and the place of written constitutions in such an understanding. In particular, it results in a deep ambivalence about whether authority is located within or without the legal order. That ambivalence also manifests itself within positivist legal theory, which explains the affinity between theories of constituent power and legal positivist accounts of authority. Legal theory should then focus on the question of law's authority as one entirely internal to legal order, thus making the question of constituent power superfluous.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aWissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB) |cBerlinen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aWZB Discussion Paper |xSP IV 2011-802en_US
dc.subject.ddc320en_US
dc.subject.keywordlegal theoryen_US
dc.subject.keywordconstitutional theoryen_US
dc.subject.keywordconstituent poweren_US
dc.subject.keywordpositivist legal theoryen_US
dc.titleConstitutionalism in an old key: Legality and constituent poweren_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn715139436en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:wzbrlc:SPIV2011802-

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.