Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/59684
Authors: 
Prato, Carlo
Strulovici, Bruno
Year of Publication: 
2010
Series/Report no.: 
Discussion Paper, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science 1515
Abstract: 
Can direct democracy provisions improve welfare over pure representative democracy? This paper studies how such provisions affect politicians' incentives and selection. While direct democracy allows citizens to correct politicians' mistakes, it also reduces the incentives of elected representatives to search for good policies. This responsibility substitution reduces citizens' ability to screen competent politicians, when elections are the only means to address political agency problems. A lower cost of direct democracy induces a negative spiral on politicians incentives, which we characterize by a disincentive multiplier. As a consequence, introducing initiatives or lowering their cost can reduce voters' expected utility. Moreover, when elections perform well in selecting politicians and provide incentives, this indirect welfare reducing effect is stronger.
Subjects: 
Direct Democracy
Initiative
Referendum
Political Agency
Delegation
JEL: 
D72
D78
P16
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
433.04 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.