Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/59629
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAl-Najjar, Nabil I.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDe Castro, Luciano I.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-04en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-12T12:33:38Z-
dc.date.available2012-07-12T12:33:38Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/59629-
dc.description.abstractThis note questions the behavioral content of second-order acts and their use in decision theoretic models. We show that there can be no verification mechanism to determine what the decision maker receives under a second-order act. This impossibility applies even in idealized repeated experiments where infinite data can be observed.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aNorthwestern Univ., Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science |cEvanstonen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aDiscussion Paper, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science |x1531en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.titleObservability and "second-order acts"en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn665455933en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US

Files in This Item:
File
Size
192.03 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.