Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/58429 
Kompletter Metadatensatz
DublinCore-FeldWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorHaile, Getinet Astatikeen
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-23-
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-15T07:34:59Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-15T07:34:59Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.piurn:nbn:de:101:1-201208174805en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/58429-
dc.description.abstractThe paper examines if workplace gender diversity offers some explanation for the decline of unions in Britain. Using the WERS2004 linked employer-employee data and alternative econometric estimators it reports an inverse relationship between workplace union density and gender diversity. Gender and ownership status based sub-group analyses suggest the inverse relationship to be stronger for male union members and those in the private sector. Gender group size based analysis reveals a positive link between workplace union density and gender diversity in workplaces with a female majority. The findings in this paper may mean that unions (and their main constituents, men) may need to embrace the changing workplace demography genuinely to improve their fate.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aInstitute for the Study of Labor (IZA) |cBonnen
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aIZA Discussion Papers |x6536en
dc.subject.jelJ51en
dc.subject.jelJ16en
dc.subject.jelJ82en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.keywordtrade union declineen
dc.subject.keywordgender diversityen
dc.subject.keywordlinked employer-employee dataen
dc.subject.keywordBritainen
dc.subject.stwGewerkschaftsmitgliedschaften
dc.subject.stwGleichstellungspolitiken
dc.subject.stwGeschlechten
dc.subject.stwDiversity Managementen
dc.subject.stwSchätzungen
dc.subject.stwGroßbritannienen
dc.titleUnion decline in Britain: Is chauvinism also to blame?-
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn71600609Xen
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
1.2 MB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.