Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/58427
Authors: 
Rosaz, Julie
Slonim, Robert
Villeval, Marie Claire
Year of Publication: 
2012
Series/Report no.: 
Discussion Paper series, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit 6475
Abstract: 
While peer effects have been shown to affect worker's productivity when workers are paid a fixed wage, there is little evidence on their influence on quitting decisions. This paper presents results from an experiment in which participants receive a piece-rate wage to perform a real-effort task. After completing a compulsory work period, the participants have the option at any time to continue working or quit. To study peer effects, we randomly assign participants to work alone or have one other worker in the room with them. When a peer is present, we manipulate the environment by giving either vague or precise feedback on the co-worker's output, and also vary whether the two workers can communicate. We find that allowing individuals to work with a co-worker present does not increase worker's productivity. However, the presence of a peer in all working conditions causes workers to quit at more similar times. When, and only when, communication is allowed, workers are significantly more likely to (1) stay longer if their partner is still working, and (2) work longer the more productive they are. We conclude that when workers receive a piece-rate wage, critical peer effects occur only when workers can communicate with each other.
Subjects: 
quits
peer effects
communication
feedback
experiment
JEL: 
C91
D83
J63
J28
J81
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
2.07 MB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.