Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/58401
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchipper, Burkhard C.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-11-10en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-12T13:34:09Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-12T13:34:09Z-
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/58401-
dc.description.abstractContrary to claims by Gul and Pesendorfer (2008), I show that standard economics makes use of non-choice evidence in a meaningful way. This is because standard economics solely grounded in the theory of choice is incomplete. That is, it has content that can not be revealed with any general choice procedure.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aDep. of Economics, Univ. of California |cDavis, Calif.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aWorking Papers, University of California, Department of Economics |x09,17en_US
dc.subject.jelA12en_US
dc.subject.jelB41en_US
dc.subject.jelC80en_US
dc.subject.jelC90en_US
dc.subject.jelD60en_US
dc.subject.jelD80en_US
dc.subject.jelD87en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordrevealed preferenceen_US
dc.subject.keywordtheory of choiceen_US
dc.subject.keywordneuroeconomicsen_US
dc.subject.keywordnon-choice evidenceen_US
dc.subject.keywordmachinesen_US
dc.titleHow mindless is standard economics really?en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn612514102en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US

Files in This Item:
File
Size
153.78 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.