Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10419/58401
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Schipper, Burkhard C. | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-11-10 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-06-12T13:34:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-12T13:34:09Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10419/58401 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Contrary to claims by Gul and Pesendorfer (2008), I show that standard economics makes use of non-choice evidence in a meaningful way. This is because standard economics solely grounded in the theory of choice is incomplete. That is, it has content that can not be revealed with any general choice procedure. | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | en |
dc.publisher | |aUniversity of California, Department of Economics |cDavis, CA | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | |aWorking Paper |x09-17 | en |
dc.subject.jel | A12 | en |
dc.subject.jel | B41 | en |
dc.subject.jel | C80 | en |
dc.subject.jel | C90 | en |
dc.subject.jel | D60 | en |
dc.subject.jel | D80 | en |
dc.subject.jel | D87 | en |
dc.subject.ddc | 330 | en |
dc.subject.keyword | revealed preference | en |
dc.subject.keyword | theory of choice | en |
dc.subject.keyword | neuroeconomics | en |
dc.subject.keyword | non-choice evidence | en |
dc.subject.keyword | machines | en |
dc.title | How mindless is standard economics really? | - |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |
dc.identifier.ppn | 612514102 | en |
dc.rights | http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen | en |
Files in This Item:
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.