Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/58349
Authors: 
Geys, Benny
Mause, Karsten
Year of Publication: 
2012
Series/Report no.: 
WZB Discussion Paper SP II 2012-105
Abstract: 
Members of parliament in many countries are legally permitted to execute (un)paid jobs in addition to their political mandate. It is often argued that such moonlighting activities are unproblematic for the chain of democratic delegation and accountability as long as outside interests/earnings are disclosed to citizen-principals; the latter may then sanction (perceived) misconduct through the ballot box. Using principal-agent theory as an analytical framework and the German national parliament as a case study, this paper discusses why the accountability mechanisms of moonlighting disclosure and electoral control are often impaired in practice. We also illustrate that these concerns generalise beyond the German setting.
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
139.15 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.