Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/57640
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKappius, Roberten_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-25en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-26T14:45:42Z-
dc.date.available2012-04-26T14:45:42Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/57640-
dc.description.abstractFor political advice towards equal opportunities in educational policy fields, different conceptualizations of the term coexist. While e.g. Roemer and Van de Gaer focused on outcome opportunities, but differed with respect to individual versus group perspective, other scholars like Sen and Thomson interpreted the norm to reflect equal initial choice sets, but differed in their interpretation of relevant choice alternatives. Normative content being partly delegated to political debate, those concepts still incorporate different framings for interpreting equality of opportunity and consequently trigger biased policies. To address this shortcoming, I propose a multidimensional scope of equal opportunity interpretations and distinguish feasibility issues of different perspectives toward equal opportunities in educational contexts. Contextual characteristics concerning elementary and vocational schooling as well as decentralized education are shown to enable more precise recommendations in terms of feasibility of equal opportunity concepts. Inclusion of divergent conceptualizations may thus prove helpful to overcome feasibility issues.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aAlbert-Ludwigs-Univ. Freiburg |cFreiburgen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aThe Constitutional Economics Network Working Papers |x02-2011en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.titleEqual opportunity in educational contexts: Comparing the feasibility of divergent conceptualizationsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn699912830en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:cenwps:022011-

Files in This Item:
File
Size
630.18 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.