Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/57631
Autoren: 
Oberlack, Christoph
Neumärker, Bernhard
Datum: 
2011
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
The Constitutional Economics Network Working Papers No. 04-2011
Zusammenfassung: 
Adaptation to the consequences of climate change has attracted increasing interest as a necessary complement to greenhouse gas mitigation. Economic approaches to climate adaptation are rarely articulated and discussed explicitly despite many benefits of such a framework-level discourse. Therefore, this article investigates how climate adaptation is framed and approached in economics and attempts to contribute to the development of economic frameworks of climate adaptation. First, the paper identifies and critically reviews four major strands of current adaptation economics: estimation of adaptation benefits and costs, strategies for adaptation, the role of markets and governments, and policy instruments for adaptation. While having their merits, serious methodical difficulties prevail. Moreover, the applied neoclassical framing seems too narrow to capture the plethora of governance challenges and normative criteria revealed in adaptation policy discourses and in the multidisciplinary adaptation literature. The second part of this article outlines an institutional economics approach to climate adaptation that addresses caveats in the current state-of-the-art and offers additional concepts to study climate adaptation. Moreover, promising methods and strategies for adaptation research are presented and future research directions suggested. Finally, the paper assesses the normative foundations of climate adaptation economics and their implications for positive adaptation research.
Schlagwörter: 
Economics of Climate Change Adaptation
Institutional Economics
Governance of Climate Adaptation
Adaptive Capacity
Barriers
Normative Economics
JEL: 
B52
D02
D63
D78
Q54
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
375.81 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.