Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/57623
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBerger, Axelen_US
dc.contributor.authorBusse, Matthiasen_US
dc.contributor.authorNunnenkamp, Peteren_US
dc.contributor.authorRoy, Martinen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-11-17en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-26T12:03:02Z-
dc.date.available2012-04-26T12:03:02Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/57623-
dc.description.abstractWe focus on investor-state dispute settlement provisions contained in various, though far from all, bilateral investment treaties as a possible determinant of BIT-related effects on bilateral FDI flows. Our estimation results prove to be sensitive to the specification of these provisions as well as the inclusion of transition countries in the sample. Stricter dispute settlement provisions do not necessarily result in higher FDI inflows so that the effectiveness of BITs as a credible commitment device remains elusive.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aWorld Trade Organization, Economic Research and Statistics Div. |cGenevaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aWTO Staff Working Paper |xERSD-2010-10en_US
dc.subject.jelF21en_US
dc.subject.jelF23en_US
dc.subject.jelK33en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordDispute Settlementen_US
dc.subject.keywordBITsen_US
dc.subject.keywordFDI flowsen_US
dc.subject.stwInvestitionsgarantieen_US
dc.subject.stwInternationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeiten_US
dc.subject.stwDirektinvestitionen_US
dc.subject.stwKapitalimporten_US
dc.subject.stwSchätzungen_US
dc.subject.stwWelten_US
dc.titleMore stringent BITs, less ambiguous effects on FDI? Not a bit!en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn639996906en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:wtowps:ERSD201010-

Files in This Item:
File
Size
166.28 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.