Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/57145
Authors: 
Strunz, Sebastian
Year of Publication: 
2011
Series/Report no.: 
University of Lüneburg Working Paper Series in Economics 205
Abstract: 
I analyze the research on social-ecological resilience from the perspective of philosophy of science in three steps. First, I explore to what degree resilience research exhibits conceptual vagueness. I find a wide spectrum of research, ranging from approaches relying on a concise conceptual framework to the perspective of resilience thinking, which builds on a cluster of vague concepts. Second, I set out the methodological arguments in favor and against conceptual vagueness. Merging both strands of reasoning in the third step, I conclude that a trade-off between vagueness and precision exists, which is to be solved differently depending on the context of resilience research. In some contexts, resilience research benefits from conceptual vagueness while in othersit depends on precision. Specifically, I argue that in resilience thinking the trade-off might be enhanced by a coherent restructuring of the conceptual framework.
Subjects: 
vagueness
philosophy of science
precision
resilience thinking
socialecological systems
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
233.54 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.