Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/56977 
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTcherneva, Pavlina R.en
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-06-
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-12T14:17:41Z-
dc.date.available2012-04-12T14:17:41Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/56977-
dc.description.abstractThe literature on public employment policies such as the job guarantee (JG) and the employer of last resort (ELR) often emphasizes their macroeconomic stabilization effects. But carefully designed and implemented policies like these can also have profound social transformative effects. In particular, they can help address enduring economic problems such as poverty and gender disparity. To examine how, this paper will look at the reform of Argentina’s Plan Jefes into Plan Familias. Plan Jefes was the hallmark stabilization policy of the Argentine government after the 2001 crisis. It guaranteed a public sector job in a community project to unemployed male and female heads of households. The vast majority of beneficiaries, however, turned out to be poor women. For a number of reasons that are explored below, the program was later reformed into a cash transfer policy, known as Plan Familias, that still exists today. The paper examines this reform in order to evaluate the relative impact of such policies on some of the most vulnerable members of society; namely, poor women. An examination of the Argentine experience based on survey evidence and fieldwork reveals that poor women overwhelmingly want paid work opportunities, and that a policy such as the JG or the ELR cannot only guarantees full employment and macroeconomic stabilization, but it can also serve as an institutional vehicle that begins to transform some of the structures and norms that produce and reproduce gender disparities. These transformative features of public employment policies are elucidated by turning to the capabilities approach developed by Amartya Sen and elaborated by Martha Nussbaum - an approach commonly invoked in the feminist literature. This paper examines how the access to paid employment can enhance what Sen defines as an individual’s 'substantive freedom'. Any policy that fosters genuine freedom begins with an understanding of what the targeted population (in this case, poor women) wants. It then devises a strategy that guarantees that such opportunities exist and removes the obstacles to accessing these opportunities.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aLevy Economics Institute of Bard College |cAnnandale-on-Hudson, NYen
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aWorking Paper |x705en
dc.subject.jelB54en
dc.subject.jelD02en
dc.subject.jelD13en
dc.subject.jelD31en
dc.subject.jelD63en
dc.subject.jelE24en
dc.subject.jelE26en
dc.subject.jelE62en
dc.subject.jelE65en
dc.subject.jelH31en
dc.subject.jelH41en
dc.subject.jelH53en
dc.subject.jelI38en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.keywordcapabilities approachen
dc.subject.keywordemployer of last resorten
dc.subject.keywordjob guaranteeen
dc.subject.keywordbasic incomeen
dc.subject.keywordcash transfersen
dc.subject.keywordpublic employmenten
dc.subject.keywordgender inequalityen
dc.subject.keywordpovertyen
dc.subject.keywordPlan Jefesen
dc.subject.keywordPlan Familiasen
dc.subject.keywordArgentinaen
dc.titleWhat do poor women want? Public employment or cash transfers? Lessons from Argentina-
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn684775506en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen

Files in This Item:
File
Size
317.65 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.