Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/56272
Authors: 
Goldfarb, Brent
Henrekson, Magnus
Rosenberg, Nathan
Year of Publication: 
2001
Series/Report no.: 
SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance 436
Abstract: 
Measured by per-capita publication measures, Sweden is an academic powerhouse. Hence, its inability to commercialize on these accomplishments is a puzzle. This paper attributes this failure to the top-down nature of Swedish policies aimed at commercializing these innovations as well as an academic environment that discourages academics from actively participating in the commercialization of their ideas. This sits in stark contrast to the US institutional setting that is characterized by competition between universities for research funds and research personnel, which in turn has led to significant academic freedoms to interact with industry, particularly by founding new firms. We conclude that the technocratic, supply-driven nature of attempts to exploit academic output in Sweden has been markedly less successful than the demand-driven market institutions in the US.
Subjects: 
Academic entrepreneurship
Innovation
R&D
Spin-off firms
Technology transfer
University-industry relations
Universities and business formation
JEL: 
J24
O31
O32
O57
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.