Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10419/56178
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Eliasson, Ann-Charlotte | en |
dc.contributor.author | Teräsvirta, Timo | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-03-28T13:05:28Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-03-28T13:05:28Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2002 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10419/56178 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In this note, we consider the contradiction between the fact that the best fit for the UK consumption data in Davidson et al. (1978) is obtained using an equation with an intercept but without an error correction term, whereas the equation with error correction and without the intercept has better post-sample forecasting properties than the former equation. This contradiction is explained and the two equations reconciled in a nonlinear framework by applying a smooth transition regression model to the data. | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | en |
dc.publisher | |aStockholm School of Economics, The Economic Research Institute (EFI) |cStockholm | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | |aSSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance |x517 | en |
dc.subject.jel | C22 | en |
dc.subject.jel | E21 | en |
dc.subject.ddc | 330 | en |
dc.subject.keyword | consumption equation | en |
dc.subject.keyword | model misspecification testing | en |
dc.subject.keyword | nonlinearity | en |
dc.subject.keyword | smooth transition regression | en |
dc.subject.stw | Konsumtheorie | en |
dc.subject.stw | Schätzung | en |
dc.subject.stw | Theorie | en |
dc.subject.stw | Fehlerkorrekturmodell | en |
dc.title | Error correction in DHSY | - |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |
dc.identifier.ppn | 35760377X | en |
dc.rights | http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen | en |
Files in This Item:
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.