Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Noesselt, Nele
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
GIGA Working Papers 188
Research on Chinese International Relations (IR) theory has produced a variety of discourses, including post-positivist analyses, contributions by area specialists and China watchers, and articles by Chinese IR scholars. These strands, however, hardly overlap or communicate with each other. To close the gap between the self-reflection of the core (Western IR) (Waever/Tickner 2009: 3) and the periphery's revolt against [Western] IR paradigms (ibid.), it is necessary to view China (and other non-Western regions) as more than simply a playground for theory testing. This paper thus goes beyond the metatheoretical debate about the possibility of non-Western IR. It argues that even though the IR debates in China are heavily influenced by the trends of Western IR Studies, the claim regarding the establishment of a Chinese school of IR is not a hollow slogan. Indigenous frameworks are already under construction.
international relations (IR) theory
world order
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
623.12 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.