Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/55118
Authors: 
Barmettler, Franziska
Fehr, Ernst
Zehnder, Christian
Year of Publication: 
2011
Series/Report no.: 
Discussion paper series // Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit 5925
Abstract: 
Social preference research has received considerable attention in recent years. Researchers have demonstrated that the presence of people with social preferences has important implications in many economic domains. However, it is important to be aware of the fact that the empirical basis of this literature relies to a large extent on experiments that do not provide anonymity between experimenter and subject. It has been argued that this lack of experimenter-subject anonymity may create selfish incentives to engage in seemingly other-regarding behavior. If this were the case these experiments would overestimate the importance of social preferences. Previous studies provide mixed results and methodological differences within and across studies make it difficult to isolate the impact of experimenter-subject anonymity on prosocial behavior. In this paper we use a novel procedure that allows us to examine the impact of the exact same ceteris-paribus variation in anonymity on behavior in three of the most commonly used games in the social preference literature. Our data does not support the hypothesis that introducing experimenter-subject anonymity affects observed prosocial behavior. We do not observe significant effects of experimenter-subject anonymity on prosocial behavior in any of our games.
Subjects: 
scrutiny
anonymity
laboratory experiments
prosocial behavior
JEL: 
C91
D03
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
287.43 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.