Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/53112
Authors: 
Mhone, Guy
Bond, Patrick
Year of Publication: 
2001
Series/Report no.: 
WIDER Discussion Papers // World Institute for Development Economics (UNU-WIDER) 2001/38
Abstract: 
Botswana and Zimbabwe represent two cases of differential access to the world economy. Notwithstanding its lack of diversification and its reliance on a primary mineral export, Botswana has prospered while Zimbabwe has fallen into a deep crisis. Historical and comparative evidence allows us to transcend the superficial presumption common to much policy discourse, namely, that the basis for success depends upon adherence to the ‘Washington Consensus’ export-oriented strategy, or to good governance, or even to geographical considerations. We argue instead that there are much deeper problems and possibilities that Botswana and Zimbabwe unveil, which relate largely to developmental linkages and aspects of agency.
Subjects: 
sub-Saharan Africa
critique of the Washington consensus
JEL: 
F13
F43
O19
O49
O54
O55
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
126.32 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.