Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJimoh, Ayodeleen_US
dc.description.abstractThe study examines the official bilateral donors’ current aid practice for private sector development (PSD). In particular, it reviews the donors’ major instruments and channels for aid delivery and the extent to which official flows have catalytic effects on private direct foreign capital flows. The major donor instruments for PSD are investment support, an enabling-environment support, privatization and commercialization, and business partnership programmes, while the major participants in the alternative channels are NGOs, governments of poor countries, firms in the recipient countries and donors’ own firms. The paper concludes that despite the prominent position occupied by NGOs in aid delivery, there is still a pertinent role for the governments of poor countries in the delivery of PSD aid, especially when the provision of public services (or social goods) is involved and the free-rider problems major. Also, as a result of the decentralized nature of the private sector, the paper highlights the urgent need for the coordination of donor efforts, requiring either the involvement of recipient governments or/and the creation of a specialized multilateral institution for PSD aid delivery. The study also identifies a number of factors that have limited the effectiveness of PSD aid. These include the gap between donor design and local conditions. Further, the paper finds that official investment-related aid flows are yet to have a catalytic effect on private direct foreign capital flows. Based on these findings, it recommends, among others, that donors should consider new approaches to their investment and partnership programmes so as to encourage technology and knowledge transfers. These alternative approaches include the propagation of the technology of the relatively more advanced poor countries into poorer countries. This would require donors to promote south-south business partnerships rather than the traditional north-south alliances. Finally, the study recommends measures that could enhance the catalytic and additionality effects of official development finance.en_US
dc.publisher|aUNU-WIDER |cHelsinkien_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aWIDER Discussion Papers // World Institute for Development Economics (UNU-WIDER) |x2002/117en_US
dc.subject.keywordofficial financeen_US
dc.subject.keywordprivate sector developmenten_US
dc.subject.keywordcatalytic effectsen_US
dc.subject.keywordadditionality effectsen_US
dc.subject.keywordaid instrumentsen_US
dc.subject.keywordaid deliveryen_US
dc.subject.stwInternationaler Krediten_US
dc.titleBilateral official finance for private sector development and the role of non-government organizationen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US

Files in This Item:
296.97 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.