Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/52886
Authors: 
Dagdeviren, Hulya
vander Hoeven, Rolph
Weeks, John
Year of Publication: 
2002
Series/Report no.: 
WIDER Discussion Papers // World Institute for Development Economics (UNU-WIDER) 2002/05
Abstract: 
Recent development literature has placed priority on poverty reduction, and on possible growth enhancement from a more equal distribution of assets and income. At the same time, empirical work consistently shows that economic growth is no more than distribution neutral. In that context, this paper explores the relationship among growth, inequality and poverty, and demonstrates the following general conclusions: 1) a redistributive growth path is always likely to be superior to a distribution neutral path (‘trickle down’) for reducing poverty; 2) a redistributive growth path is always superior if a country’s per capita income and inequality are relatively high; and 3) a static redistribution from the rich to the poor is superior to a redistributive growth path in its effect on poverty for most countries, but not for all. The paper then considers policy that might be used to make growth more equitable. – poverty ; inequality ; growth ; redistribution
JEL: 
D30
D31
H2
H5
I32
ISBN: 
9291901296
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
186.92 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.