Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/52469
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDonado, Alejandroen_US
dc.contributor.authorWälde, Klausen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-07en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-01T13:04:20Z-
dc.date.available2011-12-01T13:04:20Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/52469-
dc.description.abstractHistorically, worker movements have played a crucial role in making workplaces safer. Firms traditionally oppose better health standards. According to our interpretation, workplace safety is costly for firms but increases the average health of workers and thereby the aggregate labour supply. A laissez-faire approach in which firms set safety standards is suboptimal as workers are not fully informed of health risks associated with jobs. Safety standards set by better-informed trade unions are output and welfare increasing.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aCenter for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute (CESifo) |cMunichen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aCESifo working paper: Labour Markets |x3618en_US
dc.subject.jelJ51en_US
dc.subject.jelJ81en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordoccupational health and safetyen_US
dc.subject.keywordtrade unionsen_US
dc.subject.keywordwelfareen_US
dc.titleHow trade unions increase welfareen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn671593358en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US

Files in This Item:
File
Size
223.24 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.