Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/51663 
Year of Publication: 
2011
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 5562
Publisher: 
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
In this paper, we study the impact of prenatal sex selection on the well-being of girls by analyzing changes in children's nutritional status and mortality during the years since the diffusion of prenatal sex determination technologies in India. We further examine various channels through which prenatal sex selection might affect girls' outcomes. Using repeated cross-sections from a rich survey dataset, we show that high sex ratios at birth reflect the practice of sex selective abortion. We then exploit the large regional and time variations in the incidence of prenatal sex selection to analyze whether changes in girls' outcomes relative to boys within states and over time are associated with changes in sex ratios at birth. We find that an increase in the practice of prenatal sex selection appears to be associated with a reduction in the incidence of malnutrition among girls. The negative association is stronger for girls born in rural households and at higher birth parities. An examination of the various mechanisms linking between prenatal sex selection and children outcomes suggests that prenatal sex selection does not lead to a selection of girls into better endowed families, but there is some evidence of a larger reduction in family size for girls relative to boys. We also find an increase in girls' breastfeeding duration suggesting an improvement in parental care and treatment. On the other hand, prenatal sex selection does not appear to be associated with a reduction in excess female child mortality, or a reduction in son preference.
Subjects: 
son preference
prenatal sex selection
ultrasound
sex ratio at birth
gender discrimination
child health
JEL: 
J13
J16
I1
O12
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
740.07 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.