Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/50718 
Year of Publication: 
2008
Series/Report no.: 
Manchester Business School Working Paper No. 566
Publisher: 
The University of Manchester, Manchester Business School, Manchester
Abstract: 
Increased complexity and rapid pace of change demand more from people responsible for regional development at various levels of activity. This paper has its roots in a belief that the more complex situations are the more regional development is dependent on the leadership and network management capacity of key individuals. It suggests that by studying more deeply the roles that various individuals, and coalitions formed by them, have in institutionalisation, deinstitutionalisation and reinstitutionalisation processes might provide us with additional analytical leverage in regional development studies. This paper focuses on diffuse networks of dispersed powers from a Finnish regional development officer's point of view. Regional development officers are those people whose job it is to boost the economic development of their respective regions in Finland. The research questions discussed here are: a) What kind of power is exercised by Finnish regional development officers; and b) how do regional development officers aim to gain influence for their efforts to promote regional development? The empirical research is based on data gathered a) through 41 interviews with Finnish actors responsible for the promotion of economic development in city governments, technology centres, regional development agencies, and ministries and other national bodies, and b) through internet survey of development officers at local, regional and national levels (531 respondents, response rate 51.8%). The survey was designed to solicit information about power and influence tactics in the context of regional development. The empirical analysis shows, for example, how interpretive power and network power are more important for regional development officers than institutional and resource power, and how indirect influence tactics surpass direct tactics.
Subjects: 
regional development
regional development officer
leadership
power
influence
Finland institution
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
290.85 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.