Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/50632 
Year of Publication: 
2008
Series/Report no.: 
Department of Economics Discussion Paper No. 08,07
Publisher: 
University of Kent, Department of Economics, Canterbury
Abstract: 
An individual's contribution to a public good may be seen by others as a signal of attributes such as generosity or wealth. An individual may, therefore, choose their contribution so as to send an appropriate signal to others. In this paper we question how the inferences made by others will influence the amount contributed to the public good. Evidence suggests that individuals are naive and biased towards taking things at face value. We contrast, therefore, contributions made to a public good if others are expected to make rational inferences versus contributions if others are expected to make naive inferences.
Subjects: 
signalling
naive beliefs
public goods
JEL: 
D8
H41
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
249.72 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.