Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/50088
Authors: 
Tavoni, Massimo
Tol, Richard S.J.
Year of Publication: 
2009
Series/Report no.: 
ESRI working paper 324
Abstract: 
This paper warns against the risk of underestimating the costs -and the uncertainty about the costs- of achieving stringent stabilization targets. We argue that a straightforward review of integrated assessment models results produces biased estimates for the more ambitious climate objectives such as those compatible with the 2 °C of the European Union and the G8. The magnitude and range of estimates are significantly reduced because only the most optimistic results are reported for such targets. We suggest a procedure that addresses this partiality. The results show highly variable costs for the most difficult scenarios.
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
240.68 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.