Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/50085 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2009
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
ESRI Working Paper No. 332
Verlag: 
The Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin
Zusammenfassung: 
We impute a global social welfare function that is consistent with the burden sharing in the Kyoto Protocol and in two proposals for a post-Kyoto treaty. The Kyoto Protocol favored the EU. The Frankel proposal for a post-Kyoto treaty continues the favorable treatment of the EU, while the EU proposal puts more weight on the wellbeing of other OECD countries at the expense of its own residents. Ignoring income differences, the EU proposal for a post-Kyoto treaty favors developing countries. However, if income differences are taken into account, the EU proposal is not at all generous to developing countries.
Schlagwörter: 
climate policy
burden sharing
income inequality
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
485.38 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.