Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/49932
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMuchlinski, Elkeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-26en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-27T16:12:47Z-
dc.date.available2011-09-27T16:12:47Z-
dc.date.issued2003en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/49932-
dc.description.abstractThis paper provides textual evidence of Keynes's position on monetary policy and shaping international monetary relations. One result of my contribution is that the famous dichotomy rules versus discretion is of no relevance to his economic theory, because he used the term rules not in the meaning of a formal brilliantly designed notion.He definitely made a distinction between non-rigidly-fixed-rules and discretion. I give an explanation why his economic theory is not compatible with principles of constructivism, empiricism and ontological realism by referring to a key term of his economic writings, i.e., discretionary decision.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aFreie Univ., Fachbereich Wirtschaftswiss. |cBerlinen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aSchool of Business & Economics Discussion Paper: Economics |x2003/2en_US
dc.subject.jelB22en_US
dc.subject.jelB4en_US
dc.subject.jelE58en_US
dc.subject.jelF33en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordHistory of economic thought since 1925en_US
dc.subject.keywordMethodologyen_US
dc.subject.keywordCentral Bankingen_US
dc.subject.keywordInernational monetary arrangements and instititionsen_US
dc.titleAgainst rigid rules: Keynes's economic theoryen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn668824190en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:fubsbe:20032-

Files in This Item:
File
Size
72.16 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.