Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/49703 
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHumphrey, Steven J.en
dc.contributor.authorRenner, Elkeen
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-26T13:24:34Z-
dc.date.available2011-09-26T13:24:34Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/49703-
dc.description.abstractWe use an experimental lottery choice task and public goods game to examine if responsibility for the financial welfare of others affects decisionmaking behaviour in two different types of decision environments. We find no evidence that responsibility affects individual risk preferences. Responsibility does, however, crowd-out cooperation in a public goods game.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aThe University of Nottingham, Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics (CeDEx) |cNottinghamen
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aCeDEx Discussion Paper Series |x2011-02en
dc.subject.jelC72en
dc.subject.jelC91en
dc.subject.jelD74en
dc.subject.jelH41en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.keywordresponsibilityen
dc.subject.keywordrisk attitudesen
dc.subject.keywordsocial preferencesen
dc.subject.keywordpublic goods gameen
dc.titleThe social costs of responsibility-
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn655720057en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen

Files in This Item:
File
Size
785.91 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.