Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAngelopoulos, Konstantinosen_US
dc.contributor.authorFernandez, Bernardo X.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMalley, Jimen_US
dc.description.abstractUsing a heterogeneous agent model allowing for different degrees of complementarity between capital, skilled and unskilled labour, this paper evaluates supply-side reforms consistent with lower public debt-to-GDP in the long-run. We find that, relative to the other tax reforms, capital tax cuts lead to the highest aggregate welfare but are skill-biased and can thus increase inequality in the long-run. Depending on the elasticity of substitution between capital and unskilled labour, falls in the capital tax can result in welfare losses for unskilled workers, even in the absence of other frictions and increases in other forms of taxation. On the other hand, reductions in labour taxes can hurt the capitalists. We also show that including the transition period in the welfare evaluation lowers the inequality effects of capital tax reduc-tions since the complementarity between capital and all labour inputs is higher in the short- than in the long-run. Finally, our results suggest that a form of irrational exuberance can arise after a tax cut under heterogeneous learning in the initial conditions after the reform.en_US
dc.publisher|aCenter for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute (CESifo) |cMunichen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aCESifo working paper: Fiscal Policy, Macroeconomics and Growth |x3504en_US
dc.subject.keywordtax reformen_US
dc.subject.keywordstructural heterogeneityen_US
dc.subject.keywordadaptive learningen_US
dc.subject.stwÖffentliche Schuldenen_US
dc.subject.stwRationale Erwartungen_US
dc.titleThe distributional consequences of supply-side reforms in general equilibriumen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US

Files in This Item:
352.68 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.