Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKudryavtsev, Andreyen_US
dc.contributor.authorCohen, Gilen_US
dc.identifier.citationAdvances in Management & Applied Economics |c1792-7552 |v1 |y2011 |h1 |p15-52en_US
dc.description.abstractContemporary research documents various psychological aspects of economic thought and decision-making. The main goal of our study is to analyze the role of the hindsight bias (Fischhoff [20]) and the anchoring bias (Tversky and Kahneman [53]) in perceiving economic and financial information, and, in particular, the gender differences in the degree of these biases. Hindsight bias denotes people's tendency to overestimate, in hindsight, how predictable an outcome was in foresight, while anchoring bias refers to people's tendency to form their estimates for different categories, starting from a particular available, and often irrelevant, value and insufficiently adjusting their final judgments from this starting value. We carry out an experiment involving a group of MBA students, asking them to recall a number of recent economic and financial indicators (stock and bond market index returns, rates of inflation, urrency exchange rates, etc.). We for document that significant hindsight and anchoring bias are exhibited, on avera ge, each of our experimental questions and by vast majority of the participants. Furthermore, we document that women are more strongly affected by both behavioral biases. Possible reasons for this difference and potential implications are discussed.en_US
dc.subject.keywordbehavioral economics and financeen_US
dc.subject.keywordexperimental economics and financeen_US
dc.subject.keywordhindsight biasen_US
dc.subject.keywordinformation and knowledgeen_US
dc.titleBehavioral biases in economic and financial knowledge: Are they the same for men and women?en_US

Files in This Item:
227.07 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.