Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/48751 
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMacek, Wojciechen
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-04-
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-17T10:41:24Z-
dc.date.available2011-08-17T10:41:24Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citation|aContemporary Economics|c1897-9254|v4|h4|nVizja Press & IT|lWarsaw|y2010|p267-280en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/48751-
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents comparison of three most popular project management standards belonging to a wider group of models (for example, PMBOK, Prince 2, CMMI, ISO 10006, BS 6079, IPMA Competence Baseline, European Commission Project Cycle Management Guidelines). The author discusses methods of project management according to PMBoK, Prince 2 and ISO 10006, some chosen criteria and fields of knowledge, such as general regulations of standards, project range management, resources management, and processes connected with risk, systems of project quality management.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aVizja Press & IT |cWarsawen
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.titleMethodologies of project management-
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.ppn657392448en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen
econstor.citation.journaltitleContemporary Economicsen
econstor.citation.issn1897-9254en
econstor.citation.volume4en
econstor.citation.issue4en
econstor.citation.publisherVizja Press & ITen
econstor.citation.publisherplaceWarsawen
econstor.citation.year2010en
econstor.citation.startpage267en
econstor.citation.endpage280en

Files in This Item:
File
Size
557.86 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.