Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10419/48751
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Macek, Wojciech | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-05-04 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-08-17T10:41:24Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-08-17T10:41:24Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | |aContemporary Economics|c1897-9254|v4|h4|nVizja Press & IT|lWarsaw|y2010|p267-280 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10419/48751 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper presents comparison of three most popular project management standards belonging to a wider group of models (for example, PMBOK, Prince 2, CMMI, ISO 10006, BS 6079, IPMA Competence Baseline, European Commission Project Cycle Management Guidelines). The author discusses methods of project management according to PMBoK, Prince 2 and ISO 10006, some chosen criteria and fields of knowledge, such as general regulations of standards, project range management, resources management, and processes connected with risk, systems of project quality management. | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | en |
dc.publisher | |aVizja Press & IT |cWarsaw | en |
dc.subject.ddc | 330 | en |
dc.title | Methodologies of project management | - |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.identifier.ppn | 657392448 | en |
dc.rights | http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen | en |
econstor.citation.journaltitle | Contemporary Economics | en |
econstor.citation.issn | 1897-9254 | en |
econstor.citation.volume | 4 | en |
econstor.citation.issue | 4 | en |
econstor.citation.publisher | Vizja Press & IT | en |
econstor.citation.publisherplace | Warsaw | en |
econstor.citation.year | 2010 | en |
econstor.citation.startpage | 267 | en |
econstor.citation.endpage | 280 | en |
Files in This Item:
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.