Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10419/48158
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Czarnitzki, Dirk | en |
dc.contributor.author | Hussinger, Katrin | en |
dc.contributor.author | Schneider, Cédric | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-07-07 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-07-14T08:23:07Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-07-14T08:23:07Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | - |
dc.identifier.pi | urn:nbn:de:bsz:180-madoc-31980 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10419/48158 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This study investigates whether standard patent measures for the importance and basicness of patents are able to distinguish between 'wacky' patents and a control group of randomly drawn patents. Our findings show that forward citations are good predictors of importance. However, the 'wacky' patents have higher originality, generality and average citation lags than the controls, which suggests that these indicators should be interpreted carefully. | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | en |
dc.publisher | |aZentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW) |cMannheim | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | |aZEW Discussion Papers |x11-044 | en |
dc.subject.jel | O34 | en |
dc.subject.ddc | 330 | en |
dc.subject.keyword | patents | en |
dc.subject.keyword | patent indicators | en |
dc.subject.keyword | quality measurement | en |
dc.title | 'Wacky' patents meet economic indicators | - |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |
dc.identifier.ppn | 663767482 | en |
dc.rights | http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen | en |
dc.identifier.repec | RePEc:zbw:zewdip:11044 | en |
Files in This Item:
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.