Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10419/47440
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Knieps, Günter | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-06-30 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-07-01T15:06:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-07-01T15:06:08Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10419/47440 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In the U.S. paying for priority arrangements between Internet access service providers and Internet application providers to favor some traffic over other traf-fic is considered unreasonable discrimination. In Europe the focus is on mini-mum traffic quality requirements. It can be shown that neither market power nor universal service arguments can justify traffic quality regulation. In particular, heterogeneous demand for traffic quality for delay sensitive versus delay insen-sitive applications requires traffic quality differentiation, priority pricing and evolutionary development of minimal traffic qualities. | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | en |
dc.publisher | |aAlbert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Institut für Verkehrswissenschaft und Regionalpolitik |cFreiburg i. Br. | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | |aDiskussionsbeitrag |x136 | en |
dc.subject.ddc | 330 | en |
dc.title | Market driven network neutrality and the fallacies of Internet traffic quality regulation | - |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |
dc.identifier.ppn | 663375541 | en |
dc.rights | http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen | en |
dc.identifier.repec | RePEc:zbw:aluivr:136 | en |
Files in This Item:
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.