Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/47440
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKnieps, Günteren_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-30en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-07-01T15:06:08Z-
dc.date.available2011-07-01T15:06:08Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/47440-
dc.description.abstractIn the U.S. paying for priority arrangements between Internet access service providers and Internet application providers to favor some traffic over other traf-fic is considered unreasonable discrimination. In Europe the focus is on mini-mum traffic quality requirements. It can be shown that neither market power nor universal service arguments can justify traffic quality regulation. In particular, heterogeneous demand for traffic quality for delay sensitive versus delay insen-sitive applications requires traffic quality differentiation, priority pricing and evolutionary development of minimal traffic qualities.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aInst. für Verkehrswiss. und Regionalpolitik |cFreiburg i. Br.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aDiskussionsbeiträge // Institut für Verkehrswissenschaft und Regionalpolitik |x136en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.titleMarket driven network neutrality and the fallacies of Internet traffic quality regulationen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn663375541en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:aluivr:136-

Files in This Item:
File
Size
106.03 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.