Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/45859 
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCavicchi, Pieroen
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-26-
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-22T16:17:14Z-
dc.date.available2011-06-22T16:17:14Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/45859-
dc.description.abstractIntroduced by Article 9 of Regulation 1/2003, commitment decisions represent a tool - alternative to Article 7 infringement decisions - available to the European Commission in order to ensure an effective implementation of the EU antitrust rules. Over the last few years there has been an increased recourse to commitment decisions in antitrust cases. This paper explores the reasons for the apparent success of this new instrument and anticipates the consequences of the recent Alrosa judgment rendered by the European Court of Justice, which limits the judicial review of commitment decisions to the manifest incorrectness of the Commission's assessment. The paper concludes that, in light of the extent of the Commission's discretion as to the adoption of commitment decisions defined by the Court in Alrosa, the observed trend seems likely to continue. In particular, given the generous boundaries set by the Court to the Commission's discretionary power, hopes of avoiding system failures in commitment decisions seem actually to be pinned on the Commission's self-restraint more than on the potential for control by the Luxembourg Courts.en
dc.language.isogeren
dc.publisher|aEuropa-Kolleg Hamburg, Institute for European Integration |cHamburgen
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aDiscussion Paper |x3/11en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.keywordArticle 9 of Regulation 1/2003en
dc.subject.keywordArticle 7 of Regulation 1/2003en
dc.subject.keywordcommitment decisionsen
dc.subject.keywordinfringement decisionsen
dc.subject.keywordCommission's discretionary poweren
dc.subject.keywordprinciple of proportionalityen
dc.subject.keywordECJ Alrosa judgmenten
dc.titleThe European commission's discretion as to the adoption of Article 9 commitment decisions: Lessons from Alrosa-
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn660701413en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:ekhdps:311en

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.