Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/44770
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBurda, Michael Christopheren_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-12T08:06:20Z-
dc.date.available2011-04-12T08:06:20Z-
dc.date.issued1998en_US
dc.identifier.citation|aEIB Papers |c0257-7755 |v3 |y1998 |h1 |p65-82en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/44770-
dc.description.abstractTwo or three decades from now, economic historians will note that a hallmark of successful transformation in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) was the speed in which it became a non-issue for the body politic. A corollary of this is the expectation that, as formerly centrally planned economies irrevocably transfer responsibility for resource allocation to markets, they will increasingly resemble and behave little differently from other less-developed OECD countries or advanced developing economies. The prospect of accession to the European Union has heightened an already exaggerated optimism that this transition will take little or no time at all. Since 1993, GDP in Poland has grown by more than 30 percent; in the Czech Republic by eleven percent; in Hungary by nine percent; and in Slovakia by more than 20 percent. But there is much work left to be done; these countries remain at per capita income levels well below those of the poorest EU members (1).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aEuropean Investment Bank (EIB) |cLuxembourg-
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.stwArbeitsmarktpolitiken_US
dc.subject.stwEU-Erweiterungen_US
dc.subject.stwOsteuropaen_US
dc.subject.stwOstmitteleuropaen_US
dc.titleThe consequences of EU enlargement for Central and Eastern labour marketsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.ppn863149545en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.