Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/44724
Authors: 
Wissel, Silvia
Wätzold, Frank
Year of Publication: 
2008
Series/Report no.: 
UFZ-Diskussionspapiere 7/2008
Abstract: 
Tradable permits have already been applied in many areas of environmental policy and may be a possible response to increasing calls for flexible conservation instruments which are able to successfully conserve biodiversity while allowing for economic development. The idea behind applying tradable permits to conservation is that developers wishing to turn land to economic purposes, thereby destroying valuable habitat, may only do so if they submit a permit to the conservation agency showing that habitat of at least the equivalent ecological value is restored elsewhere. The developer himself does not need to carry out the restoration, but may buy a permit from a third party thus allowing a market to emerge. However, applying tradable permits to biodiversity conservation is a complex issue, because destroyed and restored habitats are likely to differ. The purpose of this essay is to discuss on a conceptual level the consequences of these differences along the dimensions of type, space and time for the design of trading rules. We consider the resulting effects on trading activity in the permit market and the cost-effectiveness as well as the ecological effectiveness of the scheme. We find various trade-offs with regard to market activity, cost-effectiveness, ecological effectiveness and transaction costs .
Subjects: 
Tradable permits
conservation policy
cost-effectiveness
habitat banking
economic development
land use
market based instruments
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
135.04 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.