Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/44707
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFlockhart, Trineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-03-30en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-08T09:07:06Z-
dc.date.available2011-04-08T09:07:06Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-87-7605-376-5en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/44707-
dc.description.abstractThe popular perception of the role of NATO was famously defined by NATO's first Secretary General, Lord Ismay, as 'keeping the Russians out, the Americans in and the Germans down'. NATO's role is still essentially to keep its members safe from threats, to ensure the cohesion of the transatlantic relationship, and to transform relations between former foes. However, behind this alluringly simple description of NATO, lie complex 'self', 'we' and 'other' definitions and perceptions of roles and relevant functional tasks. This paper seeks to unravel some of the complex processes of constituting and re-constituting NATO's roles. By utilizing a combination of role theory and social identity theory the paper traces how NATO has been engaged in complex and simultaneous processes of having a role set defined for it, whilst also being deeply involved in constructing its own identity and the identity of its member states, prospective member states and partners.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aDanish Institute for International Studies (DIIS) |cCopenhagenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aDIIS working paper |x2010:04en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.stwBündnissystemen_US
dc.subject.stwSicherheitspolitiken_US
dc.subject.stwNATO-Staatenen_US
dc.titleNATO and the (re-)constitution of roles: self, we and other?en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn62122877Xen_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US

Files in This Item:
File
Size
368.19 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.