Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/43628 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2010
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
RatSWD Working Paper No. 165
Verlag: 
Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten (RatSWD), Berlin
Zusammenfassung: 
Earnings nonresponse in the Current Population Survey is roughly 30% in the monthly surveys and 20% in the annual March survey. Even if nonresponse is random, severe bias attaches to wage equation coefficient estimates on attributes not matched in the earnings imputation hot deck. If nonresponse is ignorable, unbiased estimates can be achieved by omitting imputed earners, yet little is known about whether or not CPS nonresponse is ignorable. Using sample frame measures to identify selection, we find clear-cut evidence among men but limited evidence among women for negative selection into response. Wage equation slope coefficients are affected little by selection but because of intercept shifts, wages for men and to a lesser extent women are understated, as are gender wage gaps. Selection is less severe among household heads/co-heads than among other household members.
Schlagwörter: 
response bias
imputation
earnings nonresponse
gender gap
CPS
JEL: 
J31
C81
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
407.02 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.