Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/43259
Authors: 
Laux, Christian
Leuz, Christian
Year of Publication: 
2009
Series/Report no.: 
CFS Working Paper 2009/09
Abstract: 
The recent financial crisis has led to a vigorous debate about the pros and cons of fair-value accounting (FVA). This debate presents a major challenge for FVA going forward and standard setters' push to extend FVA into other areas. In this article, we highlight four important issues as an attempt to make sense of the debate. First, much of the controversy results from confusion about what is new and different about FVA. Second, while there are legitimate concerns about marking to market (or pure FVA) in times of financial crisis, it is less clear that these problems apply to FVA as stipulated by the accounting standards, be it IFRS or U.S. GAAP. Third, historical cost accounting (HCA) is unlikely to be the remedy. There are a number of concerns about HCA as well and these problems could be larger than those with FVA. Fourth, although it is difficult to fault the FVA standards per se, implementation issues are a potential concern, especially with respect to litigation. Finally, we identify several avenues for future research.
Subjects: 
Mark-to-market
Fair value accounting
Financial institutions
Liquidity
Financial crisis
Banks
Procyclicality
JEL: 
G14
G15
G30
K22
M41
M42
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
147.45 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.