Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/40252
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLahatte, Agénoren_US
dc.contributor.authorMiquel, Ruthen_US
dc.contributor.authorLaisney, Françoisen_US
dc.contributor.authorPreston, Ianen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-24T14:01:50Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-24T14:01:50Z-
dc.date.issued1997-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/40252-
dc.description.abstractThe availability of quantity information along with expenditure information in some household surveys allows the estimation of price reactions on the basis of unit values. We compare two specifications that have been proposed in this context by Deaton (1990) and Crawford et al. (1997) in order to take account of quality effects reflected in the unit values. Using simulated data for a two-good model, and keeping Marshallian elasticities fixed, we compare true and pseudo-true quantity and quality elasticities. Expenditure elasticities are close, but we find large differences in price elasticities and even sign reversals. This suggests that, while convenient in the situation where prices are not observable, these specifications lack flexibility.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aZentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW) |cMannheim-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesZEW Discussion Papers |x97-24en_US
dc.subject.jelD11en_US
dc.subject.jelD12en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordconsumer demanden_US
dc.subject.keywordunit valuesen_US
dc.subject.keywordqualityen_US
dc.subject.keywordpseudo-true valuesen_US
dc.titleDemand Systems with Unit Values: A Comparsion of Two Specificationsen_US
dc.type|aWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn258136758en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:zewdip:9724-

Files in This Item:
File
Size
520.36 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.