Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/39550
Authors: 
Moomaw, Ronald L.
Alwosabi, Mohammed A.
Year of Publication: 
2003
Series/Report no.: 
ZEI working paper B 20-2003
Abstract: 
Gustavsson [1999] finds that policies that promote international trade increase the size of a country’s largest city relative to the country’s total population, which is defined here as an increase in urban gigantism. In contrast, Ades and Glaeser [1995] report urban gigantism is reduced by freer political institutions and, with less confidence, more open trade. In light of Henderson’s (2000) findings that excessive urban concentration inhibits economic growth, these conflicting results for the relationship between openness and urban gigantism (concentration), which are of great interest for the new economic geography, call for additional study. This study uses two measures of urban concentration and finds that lower international-trade costs are associated with lower primacy, but not with lower gigantism. Unlike Gustavsson, however, we find no evidence that lower trade costs increase gigantism.
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
252.33 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.