Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/39445
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPenkova, Emiliaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-10-29en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-08-31T12:15:06Z-
dc.date.available2010-08-31T12:15:06Z-
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/39445-
dc.description.abstractThe paper re-examines the validity of the hysteresis hypothesis by applying it to the UK import volume from the world's five largest economies: Germany, France, Italy, Japan and the USA, over the period 1975 to 1994. Disaggregated bilateral data (4-digit ISIC) are used and hysteresis is captured by dummy variable which is an extension of work by Parsley and Wei (1993). Panel estimation is undertaken and the Seemingly Unrelated Regression (SUR) technique is employed. There is evidence that hysteresis appears important for UK imports and varies across industries and countries.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aUniv., Wirtschafts- und Sozialwiss. Fak. |cDortmunden_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aWirtschaftstheoretische Diskussionsbeiträge |x05-01en_US
dc.subject.jelC23en_US
dc.subject.jelF14en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.titleAn empirical analysis of UK imports: Is there evidence of hysteresis?en_US
dc.type|aWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn61189033Xen_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-

Files in This Item:
File
Size
213.23 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.