Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/38870 
Kompletter Metadatensatz
DublinCore-FeldWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorEngel, Christophen
dc.date.accessioned2010-03-29-
dc.date.accessioned2010-08-18T11:11:43Z-
dc.date.available2010-08-18T11:11:43Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/38870-
dc.description.abstractOver the last 25 years, more than a hundred dictator game experiments have been published. This meta study summarizes the evidence. Exploiting the fact that most experiments had to fix parameters they did not intend to test, the meta study explores a rich set of control variables for multivariate analysis. It shows that Tobit models (assuming that dictators would even want to take money) and hurdle models (assuming that the decision to give a positive amount is separate from the choice of amount, conditional on giving) outperform mere meta-regression and OLS.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aMax Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods |cBonnen
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aPreprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods |x2010,07en
dc.subject.jelC24en
dc.subject.jelC91en
dc.subject.jelD03en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.stwSpieltheorieen
dc.subject.stwRationales Verhaltenen
dc.subject.stwTesten
dc.subject.stwMeta-Analyseen
dc.subject.stwTobit-Modellen
dc.titleDictator games: A meta study-
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn622756745en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
663.94 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.