Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKaranassou, Marikaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSala, Héctoren_US
dc.contributor.authorSnower, Dennis J.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe conventional wisdom that inflation and unemployment are unrelated in the long-run implies that these phenomena can be analysed by separate branches of economics. The macro literature tries to explain inflation dynamics and estimates the NAIRU. The labour macro literature tries to explain unemployment dynamics and determine the real economic factors that drive the natural rate of unemployment. We show that the orthodox view that the New Keynesian Phillips curve is vertical in the long-run and that it cannot generatesubstantial inflation persistence relies on the implausible assumption of a zero interest rate. In the light of these results, we argue that a holistic framework is needed to jointly explain the evolution of inflation and unemployment.en_US
dc.publisher|aInstitute for the Study of Labor (IZA) |cBonn-
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aIZA Discussion paper series |x2265en_US
dc.subject.keywordNatural rate of unemploymenten_US
dc.subject.keywordNew Keynesian Phillips Curve-
dc.subject.keywordInflation-unemployment tradeoff-
dc.subject.keywordInflation dynamics-
dc.subject.keywordUnemployment dynamics-
dc.titlePhillips curves and unemployment dynamics: A critique and a holistic perspectiveen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US

Files in This Item:
462.66 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.