Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/37286
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGörlitz, Katjaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-08-11T09:11:57Z-
dc.date.available2010-08-11T09:11:57Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/37286-
dc.description.abstractUsing German linked employer-employee data, this paper investigates the impact of further training on wages. The estimation technique applied was primarily introduced by Leuven and Oosterbeek (2008). The idea is to compare wages of employees who intended to participate in training but did not do so because of a random event with wages of employees who actually participated. My results suggest that the size of the point estimates of the wage returns is large, even though they are statistically insignificant. In addition, the decision to participate in training is associated with sizeable selection effects. On average, participants have an initial wage advantage of more than 3% compared to non-participants.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aVerein für Socialpolitik |cFrankfurt a. M.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aBeiträge zur Jahrestagung des Vereins für Socialpolitik 2010: Ökonomie der Familie - Session: Empirical Studies of Training and Education |xD10-V2en_US
dc.subject.jelJ24en_US
dc.subject.jelJ31en_US
dc.subject.jelJ24en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordContinuous trainingen_US
dc.subject.keywordwage returnsen_US
dc.subject.keywordselection effectsen_US
dc.titleContinuous Training and Wages. An Empirical Analysis Using a Comparison-group Approachen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn654774250-
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.