Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Pope, Robin
Selten, Reinhard
Kube, Sebastian
von Hagen, Jürgen
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
Bonn econ discussion papers 2009,26
This paper's field evidence is: (1) many official sectors rapidly forget the damage of the 1982-85 exchange rate liquidity crisis and reverted to what caused that crisis, namely a closed economy clean floats perspective; and (2) the 2006-2008/9 exchange rate liquidity shock would have been more drastic but for central bank currency swaps. This evidence is bolstered by a laboratory experiment that incorporates more aspects of real world complexity and more different sorts of official and private sector agents than are feasible in econometric or algebraic investigations and employs a new central bank cooperation-conflict model of exchange rate determination, and is within an umbrella theory of Pope, namely SKAT, the Stages of Knowledge Ahead Theory. SKAT allows for risk effects from stages omitted in normal models, including those from (a) difficulties of agents in evaluating alternatives in a complex environment in which the assumed maximization of expected utility is impossible; and (b) preference for safety and reliability is not trivialized.
clean float
managed float
IMF imposed conditions
exchange rate regime
exchange rate volatility
SKAT the Stages of Knowledge Ahead Theory
monetary policy
transparent policy
exchange rate shocks
central bank cooperation
central bank conflict
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.